| NETGEAR ME102 - Wireless access point 32 - EN |

enlarge
|
Model: ME102
Brand: Netgear
Manufacturer: Netgear
Average Rating:
(submit your review here)
Total Reviews: 33
Form factor: External
Hardware platform: PC
Data link protocol: Ethernet
|
|
|
| |
| Description: |
| NETGEAR's ME102 802.11b Wireless Access Point gives your wireless mobile workforce continuous, high-speed 11 Mpbs access to corporate network resources, e-mail and the Internet. It helps you quickly set up a new wireless network office or extend your existing Ethernet network to remote locations in your building - without the time or expense of Ethernet cabling. Equipped with a NETGEAR cable/DSL router, it lets all users on your wireless network share broadband Internet access. The ME102 supports roaming within an office, and includes 40-bit WEP encryption to ensure privacy. |
| |
| User Reviews (33 total): |
Page 1 2 of Total 2 Pages
|
If you use a Mac or XP go elsewhere, March 14, 2005
By ChrisMcD (Yorkshire, UK)
A combination of poor documentation, lack of web based interface, glitchy XP drivers and total absence of Apple drivers make this a product to avoid.
|
sweet, but missing web config, and..., May 31, 2004
By matt.mingkee (Brooklyn, NY United States)
I had this ap for 3 years, this offers good range w/orinoco and linky WUSB11 2.6 the setup requires windows (sorry for mac, linux, and pda users) I got the latest firmware, which claims bridge support but after upgrading, no luck at all to set it up as bridge, the config is very confusing, how come use mac address instead of ESSID???! the bridge setup of Linky is way easier and working, this one should have been good like linky I don't try 128bit WEP yet, but the added mac filtering is handy good: good range, mac filtering and 128bit WEP through firmware update bad: windows only setup, bridge function is not working, antenna is not removable/upgradable if you use it as ap, you'll like it, however, SMC 2804 works better, and antenna is upgradable, and NO PLATFORM
|
Great connection for a great cost, April 17, 2003
By c_mackarness (Antelope, CA USA)
After an intensive research into 802.11a due to potential cross talk with my 2.4GH wireless telephone and four wireless web cameras (X10 runs on 2.4GH) I decided I would *try* the 802.11b due to its cost and availability. I am pleasantly surprised that there is zero cross talk or interference. All cameras and phone in use, no problems! Though the phone does interfere with the cameras, it does not with the network connection... Setup was brainless, plug and play 100% for both the access point and the pcmcia card (NetGear MA401) both bought at Fry's for an excellent price. The marketing states 1650 feet-line-of-sight and 500 feet indoors (common construction, etc.) I walked my laptop, connected via the wireless connection, down the street a city block and the connection was still useable for web browsing. Did I mention the access point was laying on my garage floor, surrounded by motorcycles? I was impressed to say the least. I have mounted the access point on the ceiling of the garage (connected to one of the remote hubs on the home network) and the signal strength and distance useable have doubled. I highly recommend this unit, and NetGear pcmcia cards to connect to it.
|
Could not use, January 30, 2003
By Vibhu Agarwal (India)
There are several problems. Documentation is obviously the biggest but I am not sure if I ended up buying a defective piece. I have not been able to connect to the box using the SNMP manager. I have ensured that the IP that I assigned to it using the USB Manager is correct for my network but the SNMP manager wont find it. Nor can I ping it from another host on the LAN. So after two days of frustrating attempts I still dont have a wireless lan running and still no word from Netgear technical support. Next time ill buy a Netgear product only after a successful demo at the store.
|
Easy setup if you use Windows., October 23, 2002
By Frank Perkins (CT, USA)
Personaly, I use a linux box with 2 nic cards as my firewall/router/server. I didn't really need the wireless routers that are available so I opted for this simple access point that would add wireless capability to my home network.I was a bit worried about getting it installed on XP, but it went without a hitch. You have to say Yes to the unsigned drivers, but everything installed fine with no driver errors. However, you do need to configure this device from a Windows computer via USB. Once you configure the access point, you no longer have to have it connected via the USB. They should have put some documentation in the software, but it's pretty self explanatory. Don't forget to set the encryption to at least 64bit. Also don't forget to set the 4 keys! Just enter a bunch of numbers and write it down so you can then do the same thing on the pc connecting into the network.
|
Easy Setup, Marginal Range, October 9, 2002
By jcwebb82 (Florence, SC)
I was able to set up this AP easily including WEP encryption using the admittedly limited documentation. Connecting to Cable Modem through a Netgear RP114 Router worked well. My client was a Casio E-115 Pocket PC with a Netgear MA701 CF card and I was able to connect to Internet first time.My issue, which eventually resulted in returning both items, was that I could not find a location for the AP that would allow a good connection everywhere within my house. I have a finished attic that I use as an office where the router is located, but putting the AP in two locations in the office still resulted in poor / no reception on first floor; a first floor AP location left me with no reception in the office. Finally pulled another hardwired location to a 2nd floor bedroom, and reception was marginally acceptable up and downstairs, but not on my back deck. Maybe a different client card, maybe a marginal unit, who knows? I would recommend this for it ease of use and price for persons in small homes or requiring limited roaming capability.
|
Easy to set up. Not expensive., August 29, 2002
By Shopper
I found it very easy to set up with my AT&T cable network. All I had to do was set the DCHP to on and leave everything else on default. It worked easily on the first attempt!
|
Very technical, August 22, 2002
By unknown
Synopsis: If you are looking for a simple plug-and-play solution, the ME 102 is NOT for you. The Bad: I have called a technical support line once in the past four years (long time sys admin). I have been on the line three times with Netgear and still no resolution. This should be an indication of complexity. The "manual" included is a poster. A PDF setup manual (on CD) is only slightly better and simply does not explain the setup program options. I should qualify that setting up the access point as an open point (no encyption) is fairly straight forward for experienced wireless admins. The WEP tools are poor at best -- e.g., hexidecimal keys only (no pass phrase supported). Warning: Tech support seems to be outsourced to an offshore group and there are some language issues. The Good: The unit does have good reception and output -- regularly connect at 11 Mbps even several dozen feet away from the access point in a "noisy" office. Connecting the unit is simple. The provided USB cable and CAT 5 cable are a nice bonus. Notes: May not work well with the Dell TrueMobile 1150 wireless card used in Dell laptops -- WEP encryption is a problem.
|
SUPER EASY WIRELESS, July 25, 2002
By owner of eForeclosed.com (California, USA)
I just wanted to say that I took me more time to open the box and briefly read the instructions, that to get on the net. I can't believe how easy was this Wireless Access Point was to set up. I'll give it more than a 5 if I could. But for me it get's a 5++++. Couldn't get any easier.
|
No complaints YET!, July 22, 2002
By unknown
I just bought the Netgear ME 102 802.11b Wireless Access Point and the Netgear Wireless Card. I was up and going in less than 2 hours (includes the time to unpack everything!). I can virtually walk anywhere in my house and still can surf the internet. It's absolutely wonderful! On the downside, the documentation is VERY SCARCE! The configuration screens are not very intuitive - and it could be a nightmare for network newbies. Besides that I'll recommend it.
|
|
|
Works like a charm, July 5, 2002
By unknown
What more can I say? I plugged it in according to the manual, set it up, and I was on the air. My setup is:DSL ! HUB--- \-Main home Computer \-Access Point \-Laptop connection Manual is almost non-existent but useable. I was able to turn on security and get it to work - I used WEP64 with a set key on both ends (laptop with 802.11 card and Access Point). Great value for the money, works like a charm.
|
Inexpensive, but a little difficult to set up..., June 27, 2002
By uncle-buck (Houston, TX USA)
I bought this wireless AP to give my wife's laptop PC broadband Internet access around the house. It works pretty well and was easy to set up without encryption, but adding 128-bit WEP encryption was time consuming and frustrating. Netgear needs to improve its documentation on that. I ended up getting help from one of the USENET newsgroups as well as Netgear's tech support line. It required downloading and installing a firmware upgrade and updated configuration software from Netgear's website - something the average consumer may not be comfortable with. The Netgear tech support rep was helpful in configuring the AP, but declined to give me any advice on configuring the wireless card because it isn't a Netgear product (all I wanted to know was how and where to enter the encryption key). Also, there is a marked decline in the effective range of the unit with 128-bit encryption enabled. Having said that, now that it's up and running, it's great. But if you're not a network or PC techie, be prepared for a fairly steep learning curve.
|
Great product, bad documentation, June 4, 2002
By vachons (Laconia, NH)
The good: The product is solid and works perhaps better than advertised. I have a 100 year old Victorian house. The AP is in the basement, the laptop with wireless Orinico Gold card is 2 floors up and running at 6 Meg. No interference, no loss of signal. When I am on the main floor it is rock solid at 11 Meg. (BTW: This house is FULL of electronics , wireless and otherwise.) The bad: The documentation is so bad if you don't have networking experience you may be in over your head. Don't think for a minute that the Netgear website will help. The website has even less information than the included "flyer.". My recommendation is to set up the AP with no encryption or WEP to begin with. Get your Wirelss card and the AP talking first and make sure you can connect to the internet. The do some research on setting keys and configuring WEP.
|
Good Wireless Value for Experienced Users, April 28, 2002
By unknown
Cutting to the chase: the documentation is not very good. The "Quick Start" insert is laughably terse and will be completely worthless to the nephyte networker. Even the more detailed documentation included on the CD will provide little insight on the ins and outs of proper wireless LAN set up.That said, the ME102 is a solid wireless access point that delivers 802.11b standard networking (I'm writing my review on a laptop in a downstairs room that's connected to the Netgear). If you've done your homework and have decided upon an 802.11b solution, the ME102 is a product worthy of consideration. Recommended
|
good product, bad standard, April 22, 2002
By Douglas Metzler (Seattle, WA USA)
I think it must be the fault of 802.11 that these things have such poor range. My stupid 900mhz cordless phone goes all the way to the neighbors house yet this thing won't go from the office to the living room (I could probably do infrared from the office to the living room) without losing 74% of its signal strength.That said it was easy to setup, though it didn't have DHCP capability, so required me to set an IP address and it would have been better if they had allowed me to configure it via the net rather than a USB cable since it's on top of a tall bookshelf on the end of a 50' net cable (to get range). But that said it's a pretty solid piece of hardware and works flawlessly within the confines of the standard.
|
I liked the setup and firmware upgrade but..., April 8, 2002
By joiquank (Lindon, UTAH USA)
I had no problem setting up this access point and upgrading the firmware, but my experience so far is that I have to reset the device far too often for my liking. The signal drops to the point that I loose network connectivity on my clients, and no matter how many times I rescan the channels with the PCcard software, the signal does not return until I pull the access point's power plug and put it back in. I have had to do this almost daily. When the device is not hung and needing a reset, it works great. It has good signal strength, and provides acceptable all-around area coverage in my home. I do think that I will save up for a higher quality product like Aironet though. This being my first experience with wireless networking I would say that for the low cost, I guess this one is OK. I would appreciate a more reliable signal though.
|
One huge initial problem, but now working well!, April 6, 2002
By howdydudes (Denver, CO United States)
After a HUGE initial hassle, I got this up and running and it has worked well since. I bought this some time ago I think it was pretty newly released and the documentation had some holes in it...specifically it didn't mention that the software for the "host" machine was required if you wanted to set up security encryption. I was attempting to set the security without this and the two protocols being used were not matching. Contacting Netgear Tech Support was a nightmare. It took multiple emails and multiple phone calls. After about a week, I finally found someone who could help and I got an answer.Now for the good news... Once that was resolved, I have not had another problem with this. In fact, I even upgraded to Windows XP from Windows 98se and still had no problems. (Now that is impressive...just about every other piece of hardware did have troubles with XP when it was first released!)
So all in all, I am now very happy with this Access Point. But it only gets 3 stars because it was a really bad start.
|
An excellent wireless networking product, March 9, 2002
By Vic (Portland, OR USA)
We added the ME102 Wireless Access Point to our existing 6 station hardwired home-office network and have been totally happy with it ever since. Living in a 4 floor home with offices, we found some places we couldn't reach efficiently with cable. Because we started out originally with Netgear we decided to stay with them just in case there might be compatibility issues (we've haven't really ever found any though). We connected the access point to a hard wire point or our network at a central point on our second floor with absolutely no problems. The accompanying connectors and software made set-up easy. We were up and going in a few minutes. Signal strength has been great in all the locations we use. Currently we have 2 laptops and a desktop added to the network on the wireless system on various floors and through walls as well. We are having no problems at all. One one older Netgear Switch (FS 108) we had some heat problems that others have noticed and written about as well. This isn't a problem with the wireless access point. Basically I love the product-- In fact I've never gone wrong with Netgear.
|
Very nice; great performance and stability, February 13, 2002
By unknown
Nice unit; save yourself some time and download/install the latest Netgear drivers for both the AP and the MA402. The MA402 utils comes with a WEP passphrase option, but no go for the SNMP util. I downloaded the latest Linksys WAP11 SMNP utils which has this feature (look for it soon from Netgear). Very nice, using the passphrase I easily set up 128 bit WEP and am surfing from the sofa.
|
Works anywhere and is portable, February 11, 2002
By sehmid (Potomac, MD)
This is the best of both worlds since I can use it on my PC or my laptop. It is not as convenient as my pcmcia card, but it is more useful since I can use it with my PC's as well. Excellent range and no interference experienced.
|
Page 1 2 of Total 2 Pages
|
|
| Copyright 2001-2007 WiFiReview.com |
|