| Netgear MR314 802.11b Wireless Cable/DSL Router with 4-Port Switch |

enlarge
|
Model: MR314
Brand: Netgear
Manufacturer: Netgear
Average Rating:
(submit your review here)
Total Reviews: 121
Platforms: Windows NT, Windows 98, Windows 2000, Windows NT 3.5, Windows NT 4, Windows NT 5, Windows Me, Windows XP, Windows 2000 Server, Windows
Form factor: External
Hardware platform: PC
Data link protocol: Ethernet, Fast Ethernet, IEEE 802.11b
|
|
|
| |
| Features: |
Wireless or wired Internet access through a broadband modem Enables Cable/DSL modem connection sharing via its built in 4-port switch or integrated wireless IEEE 802.11b Access Point Robust control features including web content filtering, logging, reporting and alerts Sturdy design, durable metal construction NAT routing security and Virtual Private Network (VPN) pass-through support |
| |
| Description: |
| NETGEAR's FR314 Cable/DSL Firewall Router provides a higher level of security for small offices and affords parents the worry-free administration of their networks with true, hardware-based firewall security. Designed with Stateful Packet Inspection technology to prevent DOS attacks and malicious packets, it also provides Internet access filtering capability (based on time of day, web address, or web address keywords), high-speed Internet sharing, VPN pass-through, logging and reporting capabilities, and easy, web-based setup. |
| |
| User Reviews (121 total): |
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 of Total 6 Pages
|
Very solid wireless router, April 22, 2008
By user (Madison, WI United States)
I bought this router many years ago, and it has been a solid performer. I have very rarely had to reboot it (maybe once or twice a year). We have three computers and a printer plugged into the four ethernet ports, and several computers connected via wireless. I like the feature of being able to block keywords and URLs. Although this wireless router has older technology (no WPA), it does have a MAC access table and WEP. The range has been fine for our two story house, except the signal dies in the farthest corner of the house.
I have considered buying a newer wireless router to be able to extend the signal a bit, but after reading many reviews, it looks like this router may be the one I want to keep.
|
device is reliable, January 9, 2008
By user (USA)
I read the reviews before me and bought the device.
Thank God I don't have the problems of the less fortunate people with this device. So far so good.
The setup took a while because my laptop's wireless installation was messed up, but I got it working.
Sometimes it drops, but it gets back on quickly.
I recommend it. I researched the model that replaces this one but I heard some other worse reviews.
|
Excellent B Router, December 18, 2007
By user (Minneapolis, MN)
I had this router for a number of years with no problems. Other Netgear products I've used didn't live up to the performance of this router.
|
issues with Earthlink DSL, but works fine with SBC Yahoo!, September 22, 2004
By user (CA USA)
My brother got this for his Earthlink DSL. It never quite worked right. (Both of us took a look at it.) The connection would work for a few minutes, and then disconnect. To reconnect, you had to go through the setup again. This was quite annoying for general web browsing. However, it just won't work with internet gaming.
I had an older Linksys router w/o wireless and swapped with him. The Netgear works fine with my broadband service (SBC Yahoo!) I can VPN to work without any problems. The wireless works fine too.
As for my brother's Earthlink connection, the Linksys router is as steady as a rock.
I gave it 2 stars instead of 1 because it does seem happy with my SBC Yahoo! connection. If given a choice, I'd stick with Linksys.
|
Amazing wireless range, July 14, 2004
By user
I don't like it when people write reviews on here criticizing a product without giving real proof that it wasn't their fault. Some reviewer thought the router setup page didn't work with IE - but doesn't mention any attempt with a different browser. So beware of noobs.I have a MR814 v1, MR814 v2 and a D-Link 514 and none of them have offered the range this beast provides. I acquired this model after returning a defective MR814 v1, and initially I was annoyed to get an older model. But I think they sent this for a reason - it's much more reliable than the 814. Someone on here complains that they can't get reception over 100ft from the AP - how big is their house?? I have the router upstairs on one side of the house and can get a signal fine outdoors on the other side of the house - i.e. travelling through all the walls of the house (approx 42 ft away). Also I have tested it with my PCMCIA SMC card and a Netgear MA111 USB wifi dongle, and the dongle provdies better connection than the pcmcia, so there is some proper evidence of testing being done here. It doesn't look nearly as good (or as small) as my other routers but if it does the job as well as it has so far - it is my first choice.
|
Nicely built but has big issues, May 1, 2004
By user (Independence, MO)
I bought this thing about a year ago and it worked pretty well. For a while. But after having to reboot the thing every few weeks I started to get a little tired of it. Now, I am not trying to run a lot of machines through it - a Linux box on ethernet, a Sony Clie, Tivo, and an iMac over 802.11, plus Packet8 for my phone service over ethernet. No great strain on the processor. So, why does the thing insist on locking up so much? To add to the problem, you can be going along just nicely on ethernet and suddenly the 802.11 dies. Now, asside from the thing croaking and needing rebooting weekly, I get to do a complete factory reset once a month, wiping out all the stuff I have programmed into it (WEP keys, etc), because the thing will completely quit responding. One would think that the problems are related to something overheating. But no, that is not it. That leaves the unit's firmware to be suspect. After reading about Netgear's sloppy code writing and their DoS attack against the University of Wisconsin time servers, I have to believe software is the issue. If they wrote code as bad as that which caused the UofWisc flood, I am sure awful code abounds in all their products.
|
Good price; rock solid performance with a variety of devices, January 19, 2004
By user (Central Maryland, USA)
After trying with three other brands (Linksys, Belkin and one I can't remember), this is the router that finally was able to bring together the parts of my network. Its installation and cpnfiguration were straightforward. It hasn't had any issues with any of my networking options (one wired PC, one PCI-card adapter on a desktop, one USB wireless adapter on a desktop, one USB wireless adapter on a TiVo --Linux!-- and one PCMCIA card on a laptop). It recognized and communicated with each of these from the first plug in, and it gives good signal strength from its location in one corner of the house to the farthest device which is one floor up and on the opposite side. MAC filtering and WEP configurations were also easy. Any vendor can ship a bad unit of course-- but this has handled its networking across every available adapter type and multiple operating systems without missing a beat.
|
Great for the price, November 5, 2003
By user (Salem, OR USA)
This is a great little router. I've used it for 18 months with only a couple of minor problems. Range is adequate but not exceptional. I have a large house and there are dead spots where the wireless signal just isn't stong enough to work. The ability to add an external antenna would probably help, but alas, Netgear did not see fit to include that feature in the model. My second problem happened just a couple of weeks ago. The wireless functions quit altogether. Netgear's tech support (like most anymore unfortunatly, was of almost no help. The read from a script if you can get past the voice-mail tangle at all. Finally I downloaded the latest firmware update and uploaded it to my router. BAM! it started working again like a champ. Too bad it took so long to figure that out. While I was trying to work it out I ordered a new MR814 which arrived today. Now I don't need that new one.
|
Good unit., October 24, 2003
By user (San Diego, CA United States)
I purchased this for my brother in law. Setup was good and the quality of the card seem to be on par with the rest of them. The signal strength isn't as good as my Linksys. It had trouble getting through some thick walls, but it's an old house. I've never been a netgear fan, but the price of this after rebates was a good deal at the time. Overall I was impressed. I'd buy Netgear again.
|
Not a good wireless access point, October 12, 2003
By user (Sunnyvale, CA USA)
The netgear router is just too basic. It can't set non-standard gateways. Its signal seems pretty weak - only works for about 100 feet. I am off to buy a new one, as I've just had enough of this one.
|
|
|
Steady, Reliable, Once You Get it Working, September 25, 2003
By user (USA)
I am using the Netgear MR314 wireless router a with Verizon DSL Wirespeed connection.I had to update the firmware on the router before I could get anything to work. However once that was done, everything was a charm. Setting the SSID and the WEP encryption is easy and recommended so as not to have your bandwidth stolen by your next door neighbor! I've never had a problem with connections dropping and I am also using the netgear MA401 wireless card with this router. Remember: Unless a product is WI-FI certified it is best to use like brands to insure compatibility, however most people get excellent results mixing brands even though there is always a chance that non WI-FI 802.11b products may not work together.
|
Netgear Nightmare!, August 7, 2003
By user (Lake Mary, Florida United States)
This Netgear router will lose its connection often to wirless cards in computers that have Netgear wireless cards. After ten months in service,the tranmitting mode went out.Called customer service for a RMA number(required) and told to hold for 55 minutes. Never got through! Buy another brand!
|
Simple to setup, works great, July 13, 2003
By user (New Orleans, LA United States)
I recently replaced my original Apple Airport (Graphite) with a Netgear MR314. The MR314 was very simple to setup. It took me less than 10 minutes to get it up and running, and connected to my DSL service using PPPoE.The router comes with a 10 Mbps WAN port, 4 10/100 Mbps LAN ports, and off course supports 802.11b wireless clients. The clients that I have connected to the MR314 are a Mac PB/G3 (Pismo) with an original airport card, a Sony VAIO with a MA401 PCMCIA card, and a hardwired Mac G4. One of the advantages of the MR314 is that it supports AppleTalk routing between the WLAN and LAN clients (although not between WAN and LAN/WLAN interfaces. This allows me to fileshare between the G4 and PB using AppleTalk. Note that Netgear specifically states that the MR314 doesn't support AppleTalk, although the router does. Configuring the router is a snap through either the web interface, or the telnet interface. The router permits restricting wireless clients via MAC address, and also supports 64-bit and 128-bit WEP. Enabling 128-bit WEP doesn't affect performance from either the Mac or the PC client. The router also supports pass-through VPN connections from NATed clients -- something the original Apple Airport does not. I get terrific WLAN reception from about 50 feet away. One complaint I have is that the MR314 doesn't come with a replaceable antenna to increase range, but I don't need increased range where I live currently. The firewall works okay, although it doesn't permit stealth mode operation. It can be configured to not respond to ICMP echo requests (ping request) on the WAN port, which gives sites like grc.com the impression that the WAN port is "stealthed". However, even with ping on the WAN port disabled, the router can be detected by directly attempting to connect to various ports (TCP 21, TCP 23 etc.) on the router. Overall, I am very satisfied with the product.
|
disappointing, May 20, 2003
By user (east finchley)
we're constantly needing to reboot this gadget after it declines to transmit packets. we suspected the dhcp server but switching to static addresses didn't fix it. it clicks all the time. why? it's powered by a wallwart. what is clicking? the o/s is pathetic. the u/i poor. contrary to an earlier reviewer (who probably didn't rtfm) it does offer a firewall, which runs entirely steath (checked against dslreports and grc).still, we won't buy another netgear box after this shoddy experience.
|
Terrible Router, go for Linksys, March 19, 2003
By user (NY United States)
This router has many problems. First of all the admin page does not work with internet explorer because of errors in the internal javascript code. The tech tried to blame it on IE instead. Second, it keeps dropping connection and having to get reset. It wasted a lot of my time. I set up a similar network but with Linksys and it works great. I recomment that you don't buy this
|
Works great, easy to set up, March 19, 2003
By user (Madison, AL United States)
I think this router is excellent. It was easy to set up. The documentation is easy to follow and does a great job of leading you through the setup process. Once you get it set up, just put it in a corner and let it do its work. I haven't had any problems with this item.
|
Range was limited to the same room, February 28, 2003
By user (San Francisco, CA United States)
This item did not work out for me - range was limited to a single room within my house. Returned.
|
Outstanding wireless router stays up, February 8, 2003
By user (Eden Prairie, MN United States)
I went through 2 other wireless routers from competing companies (returned both of them in less than a month) before purchasing the MR314.First and foremost, the router does NOT hang up. In the 10 months that I have owned it, it has locked up once. The others would lock up DAILY! The range was more than sufficient for my 1100 square foot apartment. Occasionally my neighbor would piggyback off of my wireless router for his work. The 4 ports allows me to hook up other non-wireless computers when I need to. The configuration process was incredibly simple and easy - again much easier than the previous routers. You will not be disappointed with this product.
|
Very disappointed, January 14, 2003
By user (San Gabriel, Ca United States)
This unit cannot be used as an access point compared to other units. Also after testing its security through various test sites, grc.com, security.norton.com, and scan.sygate.com this unit does not hide ports as well as other units also. Also static routing seems to interrupt connections. I would not recommend this unit to other people.
|
Works flawlessly with European ADSL, January 4, 2003
By user (Surrey, England)
I have been using it for four months already with my ADSL provide in the Netherlands. At the beginning I was a bit concerned that the US-targeted model might not be compatible with Euro-DSL. Not to worry. My ISP even limits my account to one permanent IP address by binding it to my MAC address. So, I gave them the MAC address of router's WAN port. I initially had a bit of a problem losing my DNS server but that was remedies when I entered a secondary DNS server in the router's configuration.Wi-Fi - I am using Netgear's MA401 PC card. The range in my three-story townhouse is excellent and I have never been out of "green" even in the backyard. And since European DECT cordless phones operate at 1.8 Ghz there cannot be any interference with Wi-Fi working at 2.4 Ghz. I am very pleased with this device. The only complaint is when I need to check for new software on "the manufactur'es" web site it is often very slow.
|
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 of Total 6 Pages
|
|
| Copyright 2001-2008 WiFiReview.com |
|